login   |    register

Scale Modeling Sponsors

See Your Ad Here!

Aurora [ MORE REVIEWS ] [ NEW STORIES ]

In-Box Review
148
Gotha G.V
Gotha Bomber
  • move

by: Frederick Boucher [ JPTRR ]


Originally published on:
AeroScale

The Gotha G.V

Built by Gothaer Waggonfabrik AG, the Gotha G.V was a heavy bomber used by the Luftstreitkräfte (Imperial German Air Service) during World War I. It corrected a design flaw of the G.IV--mounting the fuel tanks in the engine nacelles, which contributed to three-quarters of G.IVs destroyed in landing accidents! Gothaer moved the fuel tanks to the center of the fuselage. Housing Mercedes D.IVa engines rated at 190 kW (260 hp), the smaller engine nacelles were mounted on struts above the lower wing, e.g., "floating," between the wings. Thirty-six were built and began operations in August 1917.

The fuselage was fully skinned in plywood. It was noted at the time that the plywood skinning enabled the fuselage to float for some time in the event of a water landing. The Gotha belly blind spot was defended by an innovative "gun tunnel." The underside of the rear fuselage was arched, allowing placement of a rearward facing machine gun to protect from attack from below. There was a bulge from the left side of the cockpit for the pilot.

The bomber was defended by two or three 7.92 mm Parabellum MG14 machine guns, and attacked with up to 1,100 lbs of bombs.

Aurora issued their Gotha G.V in the late 1950's. At the time it may have been the largest model airplane kit produced. The Gotha was impressive, with a (relatively) slim and aesthetic fuselage, and elegant semi-swept wings. With the "floating" engine nacelles, large size, plenty of struts and bracing, three crewmen, guns and bombs, the model was a sensation.

Incarnations

The first release was kit No.126 in about 1958. In 1971 a hobbyist commissioned 1,000 of the models with slightly different box markings. In 1972 Aurora reworked the model, removed the raised plastic decal locators, and reissued the kit as No. 1126 under their Canadian subsidiary K&B. This review is Aurora kit No. 785, the 1976 issue. The dramatic box art was replaced with a photograph of the built model on a white background, and fabric texture was added to the model surface.

The model

This mighty Gotha contains 112 parts molded in olive and black. Earlier editions had two or three groundcrew, and the K&B square box editions had a vacuform display base.

The molding is fraught with flaws: sinkholes, ejector marks--notably on the mainplane struts--seam lines, and flash abound. One crew member looks as though he took a 150 mm round through the tummy! Notice the dimpling near the wingtip of the wing in the bottom of the photo. Many parts are over scale, such as the latices propeller guards. However, some pieces are fairly to-scale, like the pilot's control column and the landing gear struts. Harry Woodman said in Scale Models 1976 that, ". . if you want a scale version, you should keep the wheels, figures and engine nacelles and throw everything else away and scratch build the rest. . ."

This model is considered toy-like by today's standards. The model's fortes and foibles have long been debated, so I will touch upon the more obvious and interesting issues.

Details

Much of the detail is soft and simplified. Almost all of the control surface horns are molded on, and out of scale. The ailerons did not mate flush with the wings, so there should be a gap with noticeable hinges between them.

No solid bulkheads should compartmentalize the fuselage. The top of the front fuselage along the right half, from the nose gunner/bombardier station back to the rear gunner station should be open. There is no interior detail inside the fuselage. Nor were molded the four windows that should be at the bombardier station.

Outboard from the fuselage, the first 8 feet of lower wing (reaching just outboard the engines and main gear) was plywood with no dihedral. A gap should exist between the wooden and fabric wing segments. The belly gun tunnel is boxy--it was rounded. Tail skid was metal tubing instead of the fin style of the kit. Most wing struts are too bulky. As are the scarf rings. The Parabellum MG14 machine guns are basic. It is a shame the crew suffers from poor molding, as they have decent detail.

The fuselage is textured to simulate fabric. I do not know if the G.V had fabric over the plywood, as some Luftstreitkräfte aircraft did.

painting, decals, instructions

The instructions are simple and nicely illustrated. It includes a diagram for painting the lozenge camouflage. A rigging diagram is also included.

Initially, G.V's were used for day bombing and had the five color day lozenge print fabric on upper and lower surfaces. Most G.V's flew night bombing, typically painted with large five color dark irregular polygons. This pattern was different from the pattern used in the printed fabric. Individual markings were common. The color schemes in the instructions show "off-white" / light blue, and forest green / light blue.

The decals are over 30 years old, yet not yellowed. The national insignia are the early style, instead of the straight style. No unit information is provided though G.V's flew with Bogohl 3 (formerly Kagohl 3). Decals for two aircraft are provided, "K Z" aircraft 547, and Go G.V 504/18.

references

German Bombers of WWI in action - Aircraft No. 173 by Peter Cooksley, 2000. ISBN 1-89747-416-3
WWIin Plastic by Brad K. Hansen 1979.

conclusion

Another trip down classic memory lane. With a wingspan of over 19 inches (480 mm), and a fuselage of 10 inches (258 mm), this model debuted with a "wow" factor. Even today it is sought for building and collecting. They are rare and disappearing. It certainly requires quite a bit of work to correct deficiencies. Move slowly and deliberately to align the struts for the upper and lower wings. There are many examples of well-built Aurora G.V's on line, so you can make a good model from it.

Please remember, when contacting retailers or manufacturers, to mention that you saw their products highlighted here - on AEROSCALE.

Thanks to www.Oldmodelkits.com for permission to use the box art for this review!

Click here for additional images for this review.

SUMMARY
Highs: Interesting model, whether built out of the box, or super-detailed. Until a few days ago the only injection-molded 1/48 Gotha.
Lows: Flaws in molding, details, engineering, rare and disappearing. Much of the detail is soft and simplified. Sink marks everywhere.
Verdict: There are many examples of well-built Aurora G.V model's online, proof that you can make a good build from it.
  MOLDING & DESIGN ACCURACY:35%
  DETAIL:50%
  PRESENCE:77%
Percentage Rating
54%
  Scale: 1:48
  Mfg. ID: See Text
  Suggested Retail: Varies
  Related Link: Rob Karr's build
  PUBLISHED: Oct 06, 2010
  NATIONALITY: Germany
NETWORK-WIDE AVERAGE RATINGS
  THIS REVIEWER: 87.00%
  MAKER/PUBLISHER: 61.17%

About Frederick Boucher (JPTRR)
FROM: TENNESSEE, UNITED STATES

I'm a professional pilot with a degree in art. My first model was an AMT semi dump truck. Then Monogram's Lunar Lander right after the lunar landing. Next, Revell's 1/32 Bf-109G...cried havoc and released the dogs of modeling! My interests--if built before 1900, or after 1955, then I proba...

Copyright ©2017 text by Frederick Boucher [ JPTRR ]. Images also by copyright holder unless otherwise noted. Opinions expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of ModelGeek. All rights reserved.


Reader Reviews
Do you own this item and want to review it? You can add your review of the item here. Please read the reader review instructions before posting.


Comments

Thank you for sharing this time capsule; personally, that model along with their original D VIII, was responsible for kindling in me a lifelong fascination with World War I aviation and still to this day, brings a Cheshire cat’s size grin to my face.OMG, I remember my father showing me an advisement in a hunting magazine announcing its release. I was perhaps seven at the time and instantly obsessed. I was too young to build it, so my father built it with me watching on the kitchen table. When I was a few years older I pestered my dad to buy me that model again so I could build it. I could go on and on, but I would just be boring you all. Wow what memories, thanks again.
OCT 13, 2010 - 10:10 AM
Greetings Thomas, Just so you know that kind of "boring" talk is what we are all about here. Please Have a cup of your favorite beverage and take that open seat. Steward another setting please. Now Thomas tell us more.
OCT 13, 2010 - 04:34 PM
Thanks Stephen, I know as you so correctly point out, the accuracy of those first Aurora World War I kits left much to be desired. But to a kid modeling for the first time in the early sixties, they did for me, capture the spirit of those early warplanes. I remember finishing the Aurora SE 5 and falling in love with the most beautiful sight lines this side of Marilyn Monroe. Later as I grew older graduated to the more realistic Monogram Corsairs and Hellcats, these kits were relegated to the back of the pile or worse, simple black powder experiments. I see them all from time to time for sale on EBAY and can’t help but smile with fondness. Thanks once again
OCT 13, 2010 - 10:12 PM
Hi All, Thanks for the enjoyment! What kit would you like to see next, the Aurora F2B Bristol Fighter, or the Breguet 14?
OCT 14, 2010 - 01:13 AM
Thanks for doing the review. I would like to see the Breguet 14. Best Mark
OCT 14, 2010 - 11:33 AM
Fred, Being a longtime fan of Aurora WW I kits myself thanks for posting the Gotha review. I was surprised to see two of my projects in the photos,the Gotha G.V and the G.IV conversion. I'll echo Mark here I'd love to see your take on the Breguet 14b. Regards, Gregory Jouette
OCT 14, 2010 - 11:52 AM
I picked one up back in the 80's still in box looking for the right time to build it
OCT 17, 2010 - 10:32 PM
Actually the Gotha is accurate to the drawings it was designed with. These drawings were produced by William Wylam and others for Model Airplane News, LINK , in the 1940/1950s decades. These drawings were done to the best available data (Photos and archives such as Janes, Flight, and Aeroplane). I happen to have the drawings for the Gotha and they match closely to my Aurora Gotha, as does the F2B and the Fokker D VII, D VIII, and DR I, etc. disparaging remarks aside, the effort spent by Aurora was outstanding and the models were fun to build for this 8-10 year old even 50 years on. It looks like a Gotha! It may be far from perfect, but I am still happy to have one. 1972 molding on my self. Hard build BTW. Enjoy
OCT 18, 2010 - 01:10 PM
Thanks for this article. I have one of the original Gotha bomber modeling in the metallic red (which you can actually see through) with the raised decal locations. I put it together as a teenager back in the 50s with little painting. I dropped a few years back and managed to retrieve all the parts and put them in a box until I retired. Now I'm trying to rebuild it and fixing the problems mentioned in your article as I rebuild. The article was a great help, especially the diagram showing the model and the part sprues. The latter tell me which parts I may have to scratch build. Take care
NOV 15, 2010 - 01:31 PM
Tip: Just hit enter to submit your reply!
   

What's Your Opinion?


Photos
Click image to enlarge
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move